comparisons2026-03-105 min read

DORA vs PSD2: How They Interact for Payment Providers

DORA vs PSD2: How They Interact for Payment Providers

DORA vs PSD2: How They Interact for Payment Providers

The regulatory landscape for payment service providers in the European Union is becoming increasingly complex, with the introduction of the Directive on Digital Operational Resilience for the Financial Sector (DORA) and the Revised Payment Services Directive (PSD2). Both regulations aim to enhance the security, stability, and efficiency of the financial sector, but their interaction can be challenging to navigate for compliance officers and risk managers. This article will explore the key requirements and concepts of DORA and PSD2, outline practical implementation strategies, and highlight common mistakes to avoid.

Key Requirements and Concepts

Incident Reporting: DORA vs PSD2

One of the most significant overlaps between DORA and PSD2 is incident reporting. Both regulations require payment service providers to report incidents that could impact the continuity and security of their services.

  • DORA (Article 4): Financial entities must establish a framework for the identification, reporting, and handling of operational incidents. This includes the obligation to report significant operational incidents to the competent authority within 72 hours.
  • PSD2 (Article 96): Payment institutions are required to have procedures in place for the early identification of potentially significant operational and security incidents and to report such incidents to their competent authority immediately.

To ensure compliance with both regulations, payment service providers should:

  1. Develop a comprehensive incident management and reporting framework that covers all types of operational incidents, including security breaches, system failures, and fraud attempts.
  2. Ensure that all relevant staff are trained in incident identification, reporting, and handling procedures.
  3. Establish clear lines of communication with the competent authority for prompt reporting of significant incidents.

Operational Resilience vs Payment Security

DORA focuses on operational resilience, requiring financial entities to assess and manage risks to their operational continuity and integrity. PSD2, on the other hand, emphasizes payment security, including customer protection against fraud and unauthorized transactions.

  • DORA (Article 5): Financial entities must assess their operational resilience, identify critical and important functions, and develop plans to ensure continuity in the event of disruptions.
  • PSD2 (Article 87): Payment institutions must implement strong customer authentication measures to protect against fraud and unauthorized transactions.

To comply with both regulations, payment service providers should:

  1. Conduct a thorough risk assessment to identify critical functions and potential threats to operational resilience and payment security.
  2. Develop and implement resilience plans and strong customer authentication measures to address identified risks.
  3. Regularly review and update risk assessments, resilience plans, and security measures to adapt to changing regulatory requirements and emerging threats.

Implementation Guide

Step 1: Develop a Unified Compliance Framework

Payment service providers should develop a unified compliance framework that incorporates the requirements of both DORA and PSD2. This framework should include:

  • A comprehensive risk assessment process that covers all relevant risks to operational resilience and payment security.
  • Incident management and reporting procedures that meet the requirements of both regulations.
  • Resilience plans and strong customer authentication measures to address identified risks.

Step 2: Train Staff and Establish Clear Lines of Communication

All relevant staff should be trained in the requirements of both DORA and PSD2, as well as the company's incident management and reporting procedures. Clear lines of communication should be established with the competent authority for prompt reporting of significant incidents.

Step 3: Regularly Review and Update Compliance Measures

Payment service providers should regularly review and update their compliance measures to ensure they remain effective and in line with the latest regulatory requirements. This includes updating risk assessments, resilience plans, and security measures as needed.

Common Mistakes or Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Ignoring the Overlap: Payment service providers should not view DORA and PSD2 as separate regulations. Instead, they should recognize the overlap in requirements and develop a unified compliance framework that addresses both sets of obligations.

  2. Failing to Train Staff: All relevant staff should be trained in the requirements of both DORA and PSD2, as well as the company's incident management and reporting procedures. Failure to do so can result in non-compliance and regulatory penalties.

  3. Neglecting Resilience Plans and Security Measures: Payment service providers should develop and implement resilience plans and strong customer authentication measures to address identified risks. Failing to do so can expose the company to operational disruptions and security breaches.

How Matproof Helps

Matproof's compliance management platform can help payment service providers navigate the complex regulatory landscape of DORA and PSD2. Our platform offers a unified framework for managing compliance with both regulations, including incident reporting, risk assessments, and resilience plans. By leveraging Matproof's tools and resources, payment service providers can ensure they are meeting their obligations under DORA and PSD2, reducing the risk of regulatory penalties and operational disruptions.

DORA vs PSD2DORA PSD2 comparisonpayment provider complianceDORA PSD2 overlap

Ready to simplify compliance?

Get audit-ready in weeks, not months. See Matproof in action.

Request a demo